티스토리 뷰

mathe

Every vector space has a basis.

게으른 the lazy 2024. 8. 10. 03:02

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basis_%28linear_algebra%29

 

 

Thm. Every vector space has a basis. (even in the case of infinite dimension)

 

 

proof) Let V be a vector space other than {0}. Pick a vector x0 from V. Consider the set

 

X={SV|xS,S is linearly independent}.

 

Then (X,) is an ordered set. Obviously X is nonempty because {x}X. By Hausdorff maximal principle (see below), X has a maximal chain m. Let M:=, an upper bound of m.

 

Two things to check:

 

1) Is M linearly independent?

 

Because the set m is a chain of sets of linearly independent vectors, M also is linearly independent. For a more accurate proof, pick arbitrary n vectors v1,v2,,vn from M. Then there exists a set M1 in m which have all vi's. All sets in m are linearly independent, so is M1. All subsets of M1 are also linearly independent, so is a set only with vi's.

 

2) Does M span V?

 

If not, there exists a vector vVspan M. Then {v}M also linearly independent. Since x{v}M and M{v}M, M is not an upper bound of m. Contradiction.

 


 

 

[Z] Zorn's lemma: If every chain of a nonempty ordered set X has an upper bound, then X has a maximal element.

 

 

Caution: There may be more than one maximal element. For example, in the first set above, both b and c are maximal.

 

[H] Hausdorff maximal principle: Every ordered set has a maximal chain.

 

Caution: There may be more than one maximal chain. Again in the first set above, both {a,b} and {a,c} are maximal chains. The second set has 6 maximal chains. Find them!

 


 

 

Zorn's lemma and Hausdorff maximal principle are logically equivalent.

 

 

proof) [Z][H]

 

Let X be a nonempty ordered set, and C be a set of all chains of X. Pick any chain C1 from C, i.e., a chain of chains of X. The set C1 is an ordered set with order relation . Then the set

 

cC1c

 

is the upper bound of the chain C1, so, by Zorn's lemma, C has a maximal element which is a maximal chain of X.

 

Caution: Union of all c's above may not be maximal. Consider X={1,2,3} and a chain of chains C1={{1},{1,2}}. Union of all elements of C1 is not a maximal chain of X, but is an upper bound of C1 of which the existence is premise of Zorn's lemma.

 

[H][Z]

 

Let X be a nonempty ordered set. Suppose that every chain of X has an upper bound. By Hausdorff, X has a maximal chain C, so C also has an upper bound m. If there exists xX such that x>m, then {x}C also a chain. But this contradicts with the maximality of C. Therefore m is a maximal element of X.

 

References.

http://www.math.snu.ac.kr/~kye/lecture_V/V_set/set_10b.mp4

https://youtu.be/oGC_BU5Erkk?si=0JV0tJG9kb4DtkRK

 

Note.

If you find something wrong, please ignore them. XD

 

Special Thanks to 이보.

'mathe' 카테고리의 다른 글

"기초가 없는데 중학교 수학부터 보면 될까요?"  (2) 2024.08.11
자연수의 서수와 기수  (0) 2024.08.11
수학 위시리스트  (0) 2024.07.22
수학 공부 자료 모음  (2) 2024.07.17
수학 귀신에 나온 내용들  (0) 2024.07.14
댓글