티스토리 뷰
Thm. Every vector space has a basis. (even in the case of infinite dimension)
proof) Let $V$ be a vector space other than $\{0\}$. Pick a vector $x \neq 0$ from $V$. Consider the set
$X = \{S \subseteq V | x \in S, S$ is linearly independent$\}.$
Then $(X, \subseteq)$ is an ordered set. Obviously $X$ is nonempty because $\{x\}\in X$. By Hausdorff maximal principle (see below), $X$ has a maximal chain $m$. Let $M := \bigcup_{s\in m}{s}$, an upper bound of $m$.
Two things to check:
1) Is $M$ linearly independent?
Because the set $m$ is a chain of sets of linearly independent vectors, $M$ also is linearly independent. For a more accurate proof, pick arbitrary $n$ vectors $v_1, v_2, \dots , v_n$ from $M$. Then there exists a set $M_1$ in $m$ which have all $v_i$'s. All sets in $m$ are linearly independent, so is $M_1$. All subsets of $M_1$ are also linearly independent, so is a set only with $v_i$'s.
2) Does $M$ span $V$?
If not, there exists a vector $v\in V\setminus \text{span }M$. Then $\{v\} \cup M$ also linearly independent. Since $x\in \{v\} \cup M$ and $M \subsetneq \{v\}\cup M$, $M$ is not an upper bound of $m$. Contradiction.
$\text{[Z]}$ Zorn's lemma: If every chain of a nonempty ordered set $X$ has an upper bound, then $X$ has a maximal element.
Caution: There may be more than one maximal element. For example, in the first set above, both $b$ and $c$ are maximal.
$\text{[H]}$ Hausdorff maximal principle: Every ordered set has a maximal chain.
Caution: There may be more than one maximal chain. Again in the first set above, both $\{a, b\}$ and $\{a, c\}$ are maximal chains. The second set has 6 maximal chains. Find them!
Zorn's lemma and Hausdorff maximal principle are logically equivalent.
proof) $\text{[Z]} \to \text{[H]}$
Let $X$ be a nonempty ordered set, and $\mathcal{C}$ be a set of all chains of $X$. Pick any chain $\mathcal{C_1}$ from $\mathcal{C}$, i.e., a chain of chains of $X$. The set $\mathcal{C_1}$ is an ordered set with order relation $\subseteq$. Then the set
$$ \bigcup_{c\in\mathcal{C_1}}{c} $$
is the upper bound of the chain $\mathcal{C_1}$, so, by Zorn's lemma, $\mathcal{C}$ has a maximal element which is a maximal chain of $X$.
Caution: Union of all $c$'s above may not be maximal. Consider $X = \{1, 2, 3\}$ and a chain of chains $\mathcal{C_1} = \{\{1\}, \{1, 2\}\}$. Union of all elements of $\mathcal{C_1}$ is not a maximal chain of $X$, but is an upper bound of $\mathcal{C_1}$ of which the existence is premise of Zorn's lemma.
$\text{[H]} \to \text{[Z]}$
Let $X$ be a nonempty ordered set. Suppose that every chain of $X$ has an upper bound. By Hausdorff, $X$ has a maximal chain $C$, so $C$ also has an upper bound $m$. If there exists $x\in X$ such that $x > m$, then $\{x\} \cup C$ also a chain. But this contradicts with the maximality of $C$. Therefore $m$ is a maximal element of $X$.
References.
http://www.math.snu.ac.kr/~kye/lecture_V/V_set/set_10b.mp4
https://youtu.be/oGC_BU5Erkk?si=0JV0tJG9kb4DtkRK
Note.
If you find something wrong, please ignore them. XD
Special Thanks to 이보.
'mathe' 카테고리의 다른 글
"기초가 없는데 중학교 수학부터 보면 될까요?" (2) | 2024.08.11 |
---|---|
자연수의 서수와 기수 (0) | 2024.08.11 |
수학 위시리스트 (0) | 2024.07.22 |
수학 공부 자료 모음 (2) | 2024.07.17 |
수학 귀신에 나온 내용들 (0) | 2024.07.14 |